Italian Puma 6x6 APCs Surface in Ukraine — Without a Paper Trail
How did they get there? Was it a covert delivery? A private deal? A NATO-brokered backchannel?
The war in Ukraine just got a little more mysterious. Italian-made Puma 6x6 armored personnel carriers are now confirmed to be in active use by Ukrainian forces, specifically with the 81st Infantry Brigade.
But there’s a catch: no one knows how they got there. Unlike previous arms transfers loudly announced in donor press conferences or documented in international aid logs, the Pumas slipped quietly into Ukraine’s warzone with zero fanfare. Not from Kyiv, not from Rome.
Was it a covert delivery? A private deal? A NATO-brokered backchannel? Here’s what I know, and what makes the Puma a valuable addition to Ukraine’s battlefield mix.
Ghost Delivery
In a war that thrives on public diplomacy and arms deliveries as political statements, the silent arrival of Italian Pumas breaks form.
Most Western governments want to be seen backing Ukraine, visibly and loudly. Germany held a press event for its first Leopard tanks. France posted footage of AMX-10 RCs rolling onto Ukrainian soil. So why did Italy stay quiet?
There are a few possibilities. The delivery may have been part of a classified bilateral agreement kept out of public view for strategic reasons. Alternatively, it may have occurred through a NATO-coordinated logistics channel designed to minimize visibility, especially during a sensitive election cycle in Italy.
Another possibility? These were surplus Italian Army vehicles quietly offloaded through third-party logistics, possibly even with private sector involvement. Italy has done this before, having previously donated Puma 4x4s to Libya and Djibouti without much noise. And while Italy hasn’t confirmed this batch of vehicles, the design’s origin isn’t in dispute; Rome is one of the only countries that produces and fields the Puma 6x6 at scale.
Either way, the arrival of these vehicles speaks volumes. Someone, somewhere, wanted Ukraine to have mobile, mine-resistant, high-speed troop transports, and wanted it done without the world watching.
The Puma 6x6: Italy’s Fast, Modular Battlefield Mule
At first glance, the Puma 6x6 looks like a cousin of NATO's ubiquitous MRAPs and reconnaissance vehicles. But it’s more than just an armored box on wheels.
Originally developed by the Iveco-Oto Melara consortium in the late 1980s, the Puma was designed to complement Italy’s wheeled tank destroyer, the B1 Centauro. The 6x6 variant that’s now in Ukrainian hands is a light armored personnel carrier tailored for mobility, speed, and survivability in contested environments.
Weighing in at 8.2 tons, the Italian Puma 6x6 is powered by a 180-horsepower Iveco diesel engine that pushes the vehicle to speeds of up to 110 kilometers per hour with a maximum range of 700 kilometers. It’s crewed by a driver and gunner, with room for an additional six to eight infantry troops, making it a nimble, battle-ready personnel carrier that balances speed, survivability, and mobility.
The Puma comes with modular protection, ballistic armor against small arms fire, fragmentation resistance, and an NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) protection system.
It’s built to survive roadside blasts and shell fragments, though not designed to shrug off tank rounds or advanced anti-tank weapons. In that sense, it’s more akin to the Australian Bushmaster protected mobility vehicle, at least as far as armor is concerned.
On top, you’ll typically find a 7.62 mm or 12.7 mm machine gun. However, the vehicle can be outfitted with MILAN or TOW anti-tank missile systems for a heavier punch, depending on operational needs.
The real draw? It’s a logistics dream. Unlike tracked IFVs, the Puma doesn’t chew through fuel or maintenance hours like a Soviet-era BMP. It doesn’t need a flatbed to get to the front line. It can drive itself there.
And that’s exactly the kind of platform Ukraine needs, especially for airborne or mechanized brigades rotating in and out of contact zones quickly, or for special forces units operating behind Russian lines.
Hell, it even looks fast. But what else would you expect from the same country that produces both the Lamborghini and Ferrari.

Combat-Proven, Politically Quiet
The Italian Puma doesn’t come with the star power of a Leopard 2 or the NATO swagger of a Bradley.
There’s no cinematic footage of it blasting through mock enemy lines at European defense expos. No influencer TikToks set to AC/DC as it kicks up dust.
Instead, the Puma has spent the last two decades quietly doing the one thing military vehicles are supposed to do: show up, perform, and get soldiers home alive.
In Italian service, the Puma 6x6 has been the go-to platform for some of the country’s most agile and demanding units. The Folgore Parachute Brigade, the Lagunari amphibious troops, the 66th Air Assault Regiment, and even the mountain-climbing Alpini divisions—all use Pumas. These aren’t conventional infantry slogging through open plains. These are fast-moving, hard-hitting, light-infantry forces that operate in complex terrain and unpredictable environments. They need vehicles that can move fast, survive contact, and keep pace with modern warfare's improvisational tempo. The Puma delivers.
It’s not just about Italy, either. Rome has quietly exported or donated Pumas to several countries over the years, rarely with much public attention. Libya received 20 Puma 4x4s in 2013 during a brief thaw in relations aimed at stabilizing its fight against Islamist insurgents.
Djibouti, Argentina, and Pakistan have all used the platform for internal security, peacekeeping training, or counterinsurgency. Each transfer happened with minimal fanfare, consistent with Italy’s broader strategy of providing military aid without courting headlines.
That’s by design. Unlike France or Germany, Italy tends to practice what you might call “low-visibility diplomacy.” They contribute, often significantly, but without making it a billboard.
In Ukraine’s case, this discretion may be more strategic than cultural. Domestic politics in Italy remain divided over the war. By avoiding the media circus that usually accompanies arms deliveries, Rome can support Kyiv while sidestepping debates at home.
Italy has shipped Storm Shadow missiles and SAMP/T air defense systems while pledging $1.5 billion for 2025 alone—arming Ukraine with significant firepower while keeping the spotlight off itself.
Still, the Puma’s performance speaks louder than any press release. One unit was confirmed destroyed near Bilohorivka in Luhansk Oblast in April 2024, its remains posted by a Russian drone camera.
That wreckage tells us two things: First, the vehicle is seeing front-line action, not just being used to ferry officers or secure checkpoints. Second, the Russians saw it as a valuable enough target to record and share.

Ukrainian sources have since linked the Puma to the elite 81st Airborne Brigade, which operates in high-intensity combat zones including the forests and riverlines of the Donbas.
For an airborne unit, weight, mobility, and protection all have to strike a perfect balance. The Puma isn’t a tank, and it might not win a shootout with a BMP-3—but it will get troops in and out quickly, under armor, and with enough teeth to fight back.
So yes, the Puma has been combat-proven in Iraq and Afghanistan with NATO allies, in Libya with Italian-backed forces, and now in Ukraine under fire from Russia’s full-spectrum arsenal. But it doesn’t need a publicist. It just needs a war to prove its worth. And Ukraine, tragically, has more than enough of that to go around.
Tactical Fit for Ukraine

Ukraine’s battlefield doesn’t suffer fools—or slow, over-engineered troop transports. The terrain is unforgiving, the enemy is moderately adaptive (slowly getting better), and mobility is often the difference between a live fireteam and a memorial plaque.
The Puma’s sweet spot is rapid response. When Russian lines break through or shift unexpectedly, Ukrainian units need a vehicle that can pivot on a dime. Something light enough to avoid getting bogged down, but sturdy enough to handle the occasional artillery splash or drone-sent souvenir. And if that sounds like a unicorn vehicle, well, the Italians quietly built one years ago.
Take a look at Libya, where a Puma donated in 2013 was later jerry-rigged by Libya Dawn into a mobile 2K12 Kub (SA-6) SAM platform. That’s right, some smart, under-resourced group strapped a Cold War-era SAM system onto a light APC and called it a day. Now ask yourself: What would Ukrainian engineers do with a fleet of Pumas and access to Western surplus? If you said “FrankenSAM 2.0,” congratulations, we think alike!
Of course, this thing isn’t invincible. It won’t tank a Kornet or tank-hunting Lancet loitering overhead. But survivability in this war isn’t about invincibility—it’s about speed, smarts, and tactical flexibility. And the Puma gives all three in a tidy 8.2-ton package. It’s a low-profile, low-maintenance force multiplier.
Now, Italy’s conspicuous silence about this delivery could be deliberate. A wink-nod, gray-zone gesture of support without the political fireworks. Or maybe it’s just bureaucratic inertia; defense surplus trickling out without anyone upstairs noticing. Either way, Ukraine wins.
In a conflict dominated by the shiny and the spectacular, Patriots that make headlines, HIMARS that inspire rap songs, Leopard 2s turned YouTube stars, it’s the quiet workhorses like the Puma that keep Ukraine’s brigades moving. Whether they’re dropping an assault team outside Bakhmut, ferrying munitions across Mykolaiv, or dragging wounded out of Kherson under fire, these vehicles don’t need press conferences.
They just need diesel. And a mission.
Italy’s silence on the Puma delivery might be diplomatic, or it might just be the result of a long-term, off-book support strategy.
Either way, Ukraine is the beneficiary.
Sometimes, the best battlefield aid doesn’t come with a flag-waving ceremony. It just arrives, does its job, and disappears into the smoke.
The Puma 6x6 might be one of those quiet heroes.
Слава Україні!
Hey friends, Wes here. Do you love learning about cutting-edge military technology from an irreverent veteran anti-authoritarian? I typically post free content here on Tuesdays and Fridays.
I post two additional, deeper analysis articles exclusively for paying subscribers on Sundays and Wednesdays. Plus access to everything I’ve ever written. (Free subscribers can only see the past three weeks.)
Also, I’ve been accused of not being fair and balanced. Good. I support Ukraine and a free United States that respects due process and individual liberty for everyone, no matter their skin color or immigrant status. Disagreeing with me is cool. But Putin supporters in my comments get banned.
Stay frosty.
I applaud booting Putin puppets from the comments because fuck those guys.
Like any good poker player,you never give a 'tell'
Unlike the player who apparently has 'all the cards'