12 Comments
User's avatar
Paul Drake's avatar

Thanks I really enjoyed and appreciated that piece. FYI I almost never watch podcasts. The data rate is far too slow.

Wes O'Donnell's avatar

Totally understand, Paul.

Marcel Piers hhhhhhh's avatar

Great background info again Wes! Thank you.

Hans Torvatn's avatar

Haven’t you heard about Count Carl Hamilton before? The Swedish James Bond in 13 books by Jan Guileau? The cultural ignorance of you Americans! Of course Sweden has such agencies, they were neutral for a very long time. In WW2 the Swedes had excellent code breakers, they were very afraid of being invaded. (No wonder when Denmark and Norway had been, and Wehrmacht had 300 thousand soldiers in Norway.) They broke Engima I think. After WW2 of course the Swedes needed intelligence agencies to operate independently. If they create a new one now they know how to do it. And they have good reasons I think.

Wes O'Donnell's avatar

Thank you Hans, for my ongoing Nordic education 😆

Hans Torvatn's avatar

Thank you for your patience with minor nitpicking. Btw, you do look good in a tuxedo, but I still consider myself a reader.

Greg's avatar

Wes - as always, excellent reporting. Thank you.

Paul Drake's avatar

Wes, the transcript button is grayed out.

Wes O'Donnell's avatar

Okay Paul, if you just refresh the page, I copy and pasted my script from Word directly to the space below the video.

Paul Drake's avatar

Thanks!

Wes O'Donnell's avatar

I think the video is still processing in the background. Let me check and see what's happening.

Lutz Krüger's avatar

Well, you know, most of the „russian“ subs in the 60s and 70s in swedish waters were at the end british and US ships….even at that time russophobia was a topic. „Neutral“ Sweden at that time wasn‘t neutral at all. So if you are talking about „russian sabotage“ be sure to add real proof.