Ukraine didn’t wait for a thirty-year acquisition cycle, a gold-plated Analysis of Alternatives, and a conference room full of colonels arguing over font size.
Ukraine got invaded. Then it turned hobby drones into precision weapons, battlefield scouts, tank hunters, and flying grenades. And it did all of that while actively trying not to lose a war.
Now the Pentagon is attempting something genuinely un-Pentagon: buy cheap drones quickly, in huge numbers, and treat them more like ammunition than aircraft. That sounds simple until you remember this is the same building that can spend years studying a coffee maker if it has the word “tactical” on it.
So, here’s the question this video is actually asking. America isn’t trying to copy Ukraine’s drones one-for-one. It’s trying to copy Ukraine’s speed, scale, and battlefield feedback loop before a fight with a peer military forces the lesson the hard way.
Can it pull that off? And what happens if it can’t?
I made this video in collaboration with the New York Post.
…trump need weapons not to protect americans, he wants weapons to DEFEAT Iran, it’s not the same thing at all and main difference between US and Ukraine
Wes can you deep dive the Australian radars. It been labeled as the best in the world. CEA and JORN
https://share.google/aimode/S4UR2hQUmkN3iquoW