8 Comments
User's avatar
Proudly🇨🇦Sue's avatar

Read that Rosatom is having difficulties making ends meet too. Supposedly continuing with their international builds but domestic reactors on hold - as per yesterday's report, "points to poor economic conditions as doubts cast on nuclear projects." David Dalton, NucNet.org.

Proudly🇨🇦Sue's avatar

Picture this. KC-135 (1957) Stratotanker re-fueling a TU-95. Something to be said for harmonious sarcasm.

Connie Larsen's avatar

👍🇨🇦🫶🏻Love ya ! Sorry about the 🍊🫏

Connie Larsen's avatar

Keep it up! So happy! Obliterate

Sorry, I have no name's avatar

Great riff on “The Hunt for Red October.”

Cameron Fraser's avatar

A great deal has been written about drones being the future of warfare, and that manned aircraft (and other types of human operated weapons delivery vehicles) are a technological dead end and doomed on the battlefield. No doubt what is happening in Ukraine has been a massive eye opener for many, but I wonder about how much drone warfare is driven by a question of available industrial base. You fight with what you can build (or buy).

What is true is that aircraft like the Tu-95 and the Tu-160 have simply become too expensive for Russia to build, both in terms of cost and time. Countries with a more robust economic and industrial base simply have more options. For them, I suspect the future of warfare is somewhere between the manned systems and "all drones, all the time" world predicted by some pundits.

Chris (CJ Fitz)'s avatar

You’re a regular riot Alice. Funny stuff and very good news.

BG Pete Chiefari's avatar

Thanks Wes; always a pleasure!