7 Comments
User's avatar
Peter Kelly's avatar

Wes, just because I don't write much doesn't mean that I don't read EVERY ONE of your essays; they are well written from an informed, battle hardened and experienced base; well done Wes, and keep it up.

Cheers, Peter Kelly.

Expand full comment
Wes O'Donnell's avatar

Thanks Peter!

Expand full comment
Roger Corbett's avatar

One possible advantage of this project - any any project involving arming Ukraine with NATO standard equipment, is that it could ensure continued support for Ukraine once these get into full combat use. I am sure that NATO and EU nations will have an incentive for preventing their equipment falling into Russian hands. Also, it is a step further towards Ukraine's military becoming fully compatible with NATO - and membership.

Expand full comment
James Sheridan's avatar

As always, a well-written education! Thank you

Expand full comment
MediocreLocal's avatar

I would bet that no significant number of these will be produced by Ukraine before major combat is over.

Expand full comment
Jack Carter's avatar

The factories linked to building lynx will be priority targets for the russians. As soon they should start production… boum! I am a bit sceptical, but of course ukranians know what they are doing (hopefully). Thank you.

Expand full comment
Wes O'Donnell's avatar

I had considered that as well. I think there is some optimism that killing German workers on Ukrainian soil may be too escalatory for Putin. I hope they're right. This line of thinking hasn't stopped Russia from hitting American-businesses in Ukraine. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/08/21/major-russian-attack-western-ukraine-hits-american-factory-during-us-led-push-peace.html#:~:text=The%20Flex%20factory%20is%20one,end%20the%20war%2C%20Zelenskyy%20said.

Expand full comment